We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 29 November 12
BUMI TO PRODUCE 100 MILLION TONS OF COAL BY 2014
COALspot.com - Expansions on both BUMI’ s subsidiaries, PT Kaltim Prima Coal (KPC) and PT Arutmin Indonesia ( Arutmin) , are ...
Thursday, 29 November 12
PANAMAX : A FAIRLY STEADY MARKET WITH USD 8.5-9K/DAY FOR 2 LADEN LEGS IN ATLANTIC - FEARNLEYS
Handy
The Atlantic market continues to remain quiet due to more supply of ships. Rates from USG to Far East were around USD 18k and Black Sea to Fa ...
Thursday, 29 November 12
DRY BULK MARKET SLIGHTLY HIGHER DESPITE LULL ACTIVITY - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The dry bulk market was marginally higher yesterday, according to the industry's benchmark, the Baltic Dry Index (BDI), which rose by 7 points to 1 ...
Wednesday, 28 November 12
NEWBUILDING ORDERING PICKS UP AS SHIP OWNERS LOOK TO CLOSE DEALS BEFORE THE END OF THE YEAR - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
Ship owners are active once again in the newbuilding ordering market, as they look to clinch deals ahead of the end of the year. Once again their fo ...
Tuesday, 27 November 12
NEWCASTLE PORT HAS SHIPPED 1.79 MILLION TONS OF COAL W/E 26 NOVEMBER
COALspot.com - Newcastle port in Australia has loaded 1,793,841 MT of thermal and coking coal for week ended 0700 hours 26 November 2012, Newc ...
|
|
|
Showing 4481 to 4485 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- White Energy Company Limited
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
|
| |
| |
|
