We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 07 December 12
A NEW PHASE FOR AUSTRALIAN RESOURCES - A FITCH STREET INTERVIEW
This week Matt Jamieson spoke with Andrew Colquhoun in Fitch's Asian sovereign rating team, and Vicky Melbourne, Fitch's commodity analyst based i ...
Friday, 07 December 12
SHIPPING INDUSTRY LOOKING ON YET ANOTHER TOUGH YEAR AS WE APPROACH 2013 - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
With shipping finance "on the ropes" as traditional lenders appear to be cutting their losses and tonnage oversupply still the most import ...
Thursday, 06 December 12
PANAMAX : THE POSITIVE VIBES IN THE ATLANTIC REMAINS - FEARNLEYS AS
Handy
The Atlantic market is still depressed with dearth of cargoes and more ships. The trips from Continent to Feast fixed around USD 12k. Trips f ...
Thursday, 06 December 12
STRONG CHINESE DEMAND FOR DRY BULK COMMODITIES EXPECTED FOR 2013 - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
A new analysis from BIMCO released yesterday suggests that 2013 is expected to be a stronger year in terms of China's "hunger" for commod ...
Tuesday, 04 December 12
JATENERGY SIGNS MOU FOR INDONESIAN COAL ASSET
COALspot.com - Jatenergy Limited has announced that its fully-owned Indonesian subsidiary, PT Barata Energy (BE), has signed an exclusive, non-bindi ...
|
|
|
Showing 4471 to 4475 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- VISA Power Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- The University of Queensland
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
|
| |
| |
|
