We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 25 November 12
INDONESIA TO INDIA SUPRAMAX FREIGHT RATES ARE EXPECTED TO BE FIRM - VISTAAR
COALspot.com - The freight market was buoyant this week with all sectors up except for the Cape size index. The BDI was up by 5.21 pct closing at 10 ...
Sunday, 25 November 12
INDONESIAN SUB BITUMINOUS COAL SWAP CONTRACTS SLIDE
COALspot.com - Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swaps (FOB ) for February 2013 delivery lost 0.76percent WoW but gained 0.16 percent DoD on Friday ...
Saturday, 24 November 12
DELTA DUNIA MAKMUR PRODUCES 3.2 MILLION TONS OF COAL IN OCTOBER
COALspot.com - PT Delta Dunia Makmur Tbk., has removed 31.1 million bcm* (-4.0% YoY) of Overburden in October 2012 totaled while coal production was ...
Friday, 23 November 12
CHOOSING THE RIGHT TIME TO INVEST IN NEW VESSELS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
Shipping is all about timing, a process often rising to the height of artform, as ship owners are having to pick the exact moment of selling most of ...
Thursday, 22 November 12
HANDY: INDO-INDIA, LARGE ECO SUPRA NOW FIXED AT USD 12500 - FEARNRESEARCH
Handy
The north Continent is seeing plenty of tonnages but lack of cargoes. TA business are around 11k and fronthaul is around 17k.Tonnages has tig ...
|
|
|
Showing 4486 to 4490 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Australian Coal Association
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- The University of Queensland
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
|
| |
| |
|
