We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 07 March 13
PANAMAX : POSITIVE TREND; CAPESIZE : GRADUALLY SLIDE - FEARNLEYS AS
Handy
The Atlantic saw more cargoes than last week and rates ticking upwards. The USG-Feast was at USD 22k and Black sea-feast was at USD 12k. The ...
Tuesday, 05 March 13
NEWCASTLE PORT SHIPPED 20.77 PERCENT MORE COAL W/E 4 MARCH 2013
COALspot.com - Newcastle port in Australia has loaded 2,631,562 MT of thermal and coking coal for a week ended 0700 hours 4 March 2013, Newcas ...
Sunday, 03 March 13
INDONESIAN THERMAL COAL SWAPS; CHINA CONTRACTS FALL W-O-W
COALspot.com - Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swaps (FOB ) for average Q2’ 2013 delivery has lost 0.75 percent and CFR South China coal shipment&nbs ...
Sunday, 03 March 13
FREIGHT MARKET FROM INDONESIA EXPECTED TO BE FIRM - VISTAAR
COALspot.com – The freight market has been fairly firm this week except for cape size index.
The BDI was up by 4.64 points closing at 776 p ...
Thursday, 28 February 13
INDIA HAS INCREASED CUSTOMS DUTY AND COUNTERVAILING DUTY FOR POWER PLANT COAL
COALspot.com : The government of India raised basic customs duty and countervailing duty on steam coal. In the meantime government has reduced& ...
|
|
|
Showing 4361 to 4365 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Australian Coal Association
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|