We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 14 March 13
SHIPPERS AND CARRIERS NEED GREATER COMMUNICATION AND MUTUAL UNDERSTANDING
Press Release – Shippers and shipping lines both need to raise their game if global container supply chains are not to be habitually subject t ...
Wednesday, 13 March 13
NEWBUILDING PRICES EXHIBIT NO FALL IN PAST SIX MONTHS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
Despite the fact that oversupply has been the key plague of the shipping markets in recent years and newbuilding ordering activity has receded subst ...
Tuesday, 12 March 13
COAL MINING PRIVATIZATION IN INDIA: MUST - SUNIL K KUMBHAT
COALspot.com - India has the one of the richest coal reserves in the world and the country should have shown significant progress and gained the pos ...
Tuesday, 12 March 13
NEWCASTLE PORT SHIPPED 2.47 MILLION TONS OF COAL W/E 11 MARCH 2013
COALspot.com - Newcastle port in Australia has loaded 2,471,080 MT of thermal and coking coal for week ended 0700 hours 11 March 2013, Newcast ...
Monday, 11 March 13
SUB-BIT FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAPS FELL 1.41 PERCENT W-W
COALspot.com - Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swaps (FOB ) for average Q2’ 2013 delivery has lost 1.41percent and CFR South China coal shipment ...
|
|
|
Showing 4351 to 4355 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- White Energy Company Limited
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- The University of Queensland
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Planning Commission, India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
|
| |
| |
|
