We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 28 February 13
SHIP OWNERS EXPECTED TO FACE A CHALLENGING YEAR, DESPITE THE FALL OF NEWBUILDING ORDERS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
Tonnage oversupply and a lagging growth in world trade demand are expected to keep shipping in the "red", despite a series of measures ado ...
Thursday, 28 February 13
PANAMAX : MARKET HAS SEEN A GOOD UPTURN OVER THE LAST WEEK - FEARNLEYS
Handy
The Atlantic saw more cargoes than last week and rates ticking upwards. The USG-Feast was at USD 19k and Black Sea-Feast was at USD 11k. The ...
Wednesday, 27 February 13
NEWCASTLE PORT IN AUSTRALIA SHIPPED 0.358 MILLION MT MORE COAL W-O-W
COALspot.com - Newcastle port in Australia has loaded 2,178,869 MT of thermal and coking coal for week ended 0700 hours 25 February 2013, Newc ...
Wednesday, 27 February 13
NEWLEAD HOLDINGS LTD. ANNOUNCES COAL SUPPLY AND DELIVERY CONTRACT
NewLead Holdings Ltd. yesterday announced that the Company has signed an agreement to supply and deliver 1.48 million metric tons of steam coal to a ...
Tuesday, 26 February 13
10TH CLEAN COAL FORUM WILL BE HELD ON JUNE 2013
CDMC Events will be presenting the 10th Clean Coal Forum 2013 on June 13 - 14, 2013 in Beijing,China.
It will make you understand regulatory asp ...
|
|
|
Showing 4366 to 4370 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Australian Coal Association
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
|
| |
| |
|
