We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 29 March 13
SUB-BIT INDONESIA COAL SWAPS: UP 0.55 % WOW; CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL CONTRACT: UP 0.23 % WOW
COALspot.com - Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swaps (FOB ) for average Q2’ 2013 delivery has gained 0.55 percent and CFR South China coal shipment&nbs ...
Thursday, 28 March 13
SHIP OWNERS KEEN ON ACQUIRING SECOND HAND TONNAGE, AS WELL AS NEW BUILDINGS IN CONVENTIONAL SEGMENTS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The recent rally of the Baltic Dry Index (BDI), coupled with renewed optimism, at least in some parts of the wet market, have prompted many ship own ...
Wednesday, 27 March 13
PTBA HAS CONCLUDED US$ 16.14 BILLION WORTH OF COAL SALES AND PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH PLN
COALspot.com - PT. Bukit Asam, a 32 years old Indonesian state owned coal miner has signed a coal sales and purchase agreement with PT PLN, (a state ...
Wednesday, 27 March 13
SHIPPING CONFIDENCE REACHES HIGHEST LEVEL FOR TWO YEARS - MOORE STEPHENS
Overall confidence levels in the shipping industry recovered to their highest level for two years in the three months ended February 2013, according ...
Tuesday, 26 March 13
NEWCASTLE PORT SHIPPED 2.39 MMT OF COAL W/E 25 MARCH 2013
COALspot.com - Newcastle port in Australia has loaded 2.396 million tons of thermal and coking coal for week ended 0700 hours 25 March 2013, N ...
|
|
|
Showing 4331 to 4335 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Planning Commission, India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- The University of Queensland
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- MS Steel International - UAE
- PTC India Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Australian Coal Association
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
|
| |
| |
|
