We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 10 April 13
US COAL CONSUMPTION TO INCREASE FROM 889 MMST IN 2012 TO 948 MMST IN 2013 AND 957 MMST IN 2014 - EIA
Based on estimates for the first quarter of 2013, American coal production has continued to decline.
Total production is down 9.9 million short t ...
Wednesday, 10 April 13
DRY BULK FREIGHT RATES SEEN MOSTLY STABLE IN THE COMING WEEKS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS WORLDWIDE
In its latest report, BIMCO forecast that for the coming six weeks, Capesize time charter average rates will remain subdued around $4,500-8,500 per ...
Monday, 08 April 13
SUB-BIT INDONESIA COAL SWAPS: UPWARD TREND
COALspot.com - Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swaps (FOB ) for average Q2’ 2013 delivery has gained 2.71 percent and CFR South China coal shipment&nbs ...
Sunday, 07 April 13
CHARTER RATES ARE UNDER PRESSURE DUE TO DECLINING DEMAND - VISTAAR
COALspot.com - The freight market continued to fall further with all the indices down.
The BDI was down by 5.38 pct closing at 861 points and the ...
Friday, 05 April 13
SGX API 8 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAPS TO GO LIVE
COALspot.com - The Exchange has announced that the SGX API 8 CFR South China Coal Swap will go live for clearing on SGX-DC starting from 29 Ap ...
|
|
|
Showing 4321 to 4325 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- The University of Queensland
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- White Energy Company Limited
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
