We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 25 March 13
BUNKER FUELS ARE ABOUT TO GET CLEANER, BUT AT WHAT COST? - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The cost of bunkers is nowadays the driving force behind most ship owners' major decisions, with regulations bound to change in many parts of the w ...
Sunday, 24 March 13
THE SUB-BIT INDONESIA'S COAL SWAPS FOR Q2 DELIVERY PRICE LOST 7.47 PERCENT PMT M-O-M
COALspot.com - Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swaps (FOB ) for average Q2’ 2013 delivery has lost 3.39 percent and CFR South China coal shipment 2.65 ...
Sunday, 24 March 13
FREIGHT MARKETS CONTINUED TO FIRM - VISTAAR
COALspot.com - This freight market continued to remain firm in all segments except for cape index which softened slightly.
The BDI was up by 4.60 ...
Sunday, 24 March 13
DRY BULK MARKET PROSPECTS OFFER ROOM FOR RESTRAINED OPTIMISM SAYS SHIP OWNER - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
In its announcement regarding its annual performance, ship owner Frontline offered some useful insight on the future prospects of both the dry bulk ...
Saturday, 23 March 13
WORLD COAL TRADE FIRST PASSES 1 BILLION TONS IN 2012 - VEREIN DER KOHLENIMPORTEURE E.V
Press Release: Hard coal imports to Germany on the previous year's level in spite of regenerative energies. Imports for power plants at an all-time ...
|
|
|
Showing 4336 to 4340 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Australian Coal Association
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- The University of Queensland
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- White Energy Company Limited
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
|
| |
| |
|
