We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 29 May 13
SHIP OWNERS KEEP ON SPENDING ON NEWBUILDINGS AS PRICES ARE DEEMED TOO LOW TO RESIST - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
It's been yet another week on increased newbuilding ordering activity with Hellenic ship owners appearing rathe active, on the back of attractive f ...
Tuesday, 28 May 13
NEWCASTLE PORT SHIPPED 9.76 PERCENT MORE COAL W/E 27 MAY 2013
COALspot.com - Newcastle port in Australia has loaded 2,420,366 tons of coal for week ended 0700 hours 27 May 2013, Newcastle Port Corp. said ...
Sunday, 26 May 13
AMPLE SUPPLY, LOW DEMAND KEEP COAL PRICES UNDER PRESSURE
COALspot.com - Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swaps (FOB ) for average July 2013 delivery have lost 0.07 percent and API 8 CFR South China Coal shipment los ...
Friday, 24 May 13
ENGAGEMENT WITH POTENTIAL STRATEGIC AND OFF TAKE PARTNERS ACCELERATING - REALM RESOURCES
COALspot.com - Following the recent completion of the Feasibility Study, the Realm Resources Ltd. (ASX: RRP) has focused on securing strategic ...
Friday, 24 May 13
US'S COAL PRODUCTION INCREASED WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com – United states the world’s second largest coal producer produced totaled approximately 18.90 million short tons (mmst) of ...
|
|
|
Showing 4266 to 4270 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- White Energy Company Limited
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- PTC India Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Australian Coal Association
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Planning Commission, India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Minerals Council of Australia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
|
| |
| |
|
