We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 24 November 21
WHY THIS MINING ANALYST IS UPBEAT ON THE IRON ORE PRICE FORECAST - MOTLEY FOOL
In many ways, 2021 can be called the year of the iron ore price. Much of the talk of the ASX town this year has revolved around this key economic m ...
Wednesday, 24 November 21
PRICE OF CHINA’S COAL FUTURE DROPS BY 60% AS NATIONWIDE DAILY OUTPUT REACHES OVER 12 MILLION TONS: NDRC - GLOBAL TIMES
China’s daily coal output has now stabilized after reaching over 12 million tons and the price of coal futures has declined to 800 yuan ($125 ...
Friday, 19 November 21
CHINA: COAL SUPPLIES TO STABILIZE FOR COMING COLD SEASON
China is capable of ensuring stable coal supplies this winter and next spring with the increase in coal production and the rising stockpiles at pow ...
Wednesday, 17 November 21
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
It has been another declining week for the dry bulk market and evidently, we are seeing asset values gradually losing momentum as well. Following a ...
Tuesday, 16 November 21
EARNINGS RECOVERY IN INDONESIAN COAL TO CONTINUE THROUGH 2021, BUT SLOW IN 2022 - FITCH RATINGS
The recovery in the operating and financial performance of Indonesian coal miners and coal contractors is likely to slow in 2022, but coal prices s ...
|
|
|
Showing 406 to 410 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- The University of Queensland
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
|
| |
| |
|
