We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 12 September 13
PANAMAX : PACIFIC ROUNDS ARE NOW REPORTED BETWEEN USD 13K AND 15K PER DAY - FEARNRESEARCH
Handy
Nickel ore is a key support SE Asia/Feast rate at the moment; vessel in N.China were fixed around USD 11-12k, ships in mid China can expect a ...
Thursday, 12 September 13
CAPESIZE MARKET WILL BECOME EVEN TIGHTER - JEFFREY LANDSBERG
COALspot.com : While it is no secret that current capesize availability has become tight and has caused capesize rates to surge, availability is set ...
Thursday, 12 September 13
OVER THE WORST? WE MIGHT FIND OUT THIS WEEK - BIMCO
The shipping market has a spring in its step, even as summer draws to a close. There is it seems, confidence that finally, we are emerging into the ...
Thursday, 12 September 13
DRY BULK MARKET RALLY COMES AT A GOOD TIME FOR MOST SHIP OWNERS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The latest surge of the dry bulk market has helped offset other lingering factors, which otherwise, could have plunged freight rates to new lows. Fo ...
Wednesday, 11 September 13
ASIA - PACIFIC THERMAL COAL MARKET TO REMAIN OVERSUPPLIED IN NEXT 12 MONTHS - FITCH RATINGS
COALspot.com: Fitch Ratings says the Asia-Pacific thermal coal market will remain oversupplied in the next 12 months because strong production has b ...
|
|
|
Showing 4126 to 4130 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Planning Commission, India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
