We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 06 September 13
DRY BULK MARKET REACHES NEW YEAR-HIGHS ON THE BACK OF INCREASED CAPESIZE DEMAND - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market has been on the rise once again, but this time around any new increase of freight rates translates into new year-highs, thus bri ...
Friday, 06 September 13
US PRODUCED APPROXIMATELY 90.80 MMST OF COAL IN AUGUST
COALspot.com – United states the world’s second largest coal producer produced totaled approximately 20.90 million short tons (mmst) of ...
Thursday, 05 September 13
INDONESIAN COAL EXPORTS UP BY 6.72 PERCENT IN JULY
COALspot.com: Indonesia, the world's largest multi grade coal exporter shipped 35.268* million tons of coal in July 2013. Indonesian coal exp ...
Thursday, 05 September 13
HANDY: NICKEL ORE WAS PUSHING THE FAR EAST MARKET - FEARNLEYS
Handy
Nickel Ore was pushing the Feast market, several ships were fixed from low teens to $14k. Indo/India was still supported by bauxite, while th ...
Thursday, 05 September 13
DRY BULK MARKET ON A HIGH ROLL, MAINLY THANKS TO CAPESIZE APPETITE - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
Capesize owners have been rejoycing on the back of renewed optimism for the further rise in the dry bulk market's freight rates, especially when on ...
|
|
|
Showing 4136 to 4140 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Planning Commission, India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Australian Coal Association
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Parliament of New Zealand
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- White Energy Company Limited
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
|
| |
| |
|
