We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 17 September 13
BUMA PRODUCED 3.57 PERCENT MORE COAL IN AUGUST
COALspot.com: BUMA has removed totaled 25.20 million bcm of overburden to produce 2.90 million tons coal in August 2013. BUMI produced 3.07 percent ...
Tuesday, 17 September 13
NEWCASTLE PORT SHIPPED ABOUT 27 PERCENT MORE COAL WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com: Power plant and semi-soft coking coal shipments from Australia's Newcastle port up 27.26 per cent week on week to 3.01 million mt for ...
Tuesday, 17 September 13
TAIPOWER INVITES BIDS FOR SUPPLY OF SUB-BITUMINOUS COAL
COALspot.com - Taiwan Power Company intends to procure 1.050 million tons of sub-bituminous coal for Taipower thermal power plant through open tende ...
Tuesday, 17 September 13
ORPHEUS SECURES SIGNIFICANT INFRASTRUCTURE DEAL THROUGH ACQUISITION OF SOUTH KALIMANTAN PORT CAPACITY
COALspot.com : Orpheus Energy Limited (ASX: OEG) of Australia has today announced that, it has executed a binding agreement with the proprietor of S ...
Monday, 16 September 13
WHAT RECOVERY MEANS FOR THE CAPESIZE MARKET - COMMODORE RESEARCH
COALspot.com: The simple fact that capesize rates have been able to increase above the $9,000/mark and become much more responsive to changes in car ...
|
|
|
Showing 4116 to 4120 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- White Energy Company Limited
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Deloitte Consulting - India
|
| |
| |
|
