We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 22 September 13
BDI STRENGTHENS FURTHER AS CAPESIZE FREIGHT RATES JUMP - CAPT. REDDY
COALspot.com: The freight market continued its upward trend and maintaining the moment with BDI and Cape index up by 16 pct week on week. The Capesi ...
Sunday, 22 September 13
API 8 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAPS ADVANCE
COALspot.com : SGX has launched API 8 CFR South China Coal Swap on 29 April 2013 and SGX replaced the previous swap.
API 8 CFR South China Coal s ...
Sunday, 22 September 13
SUB-BIT INDONESIA COAL SWAPS REMAIN UNDER PRESSURE
COALspot.com – Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swap (FOB ) for average Q4 2013 delivery down 2.09 percept month on month on Friday 20 September 2 ...
Friday, 20 September 13
SHIP OWNERS INVEST MORE THAN $9.2 BILLION ON NEW BUILDING VESSELS DURING AUGUST - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
Despite the fact that August is traditionally a slow month in terms of ships investment activity, ship owners have grasped this year the opportunity ...
Friday, 20 September 13
DRY BULK MARKET REACHES NEW HEIGHTS THIS WEEK STANDING AT THREE-YEAR HIGH - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The biggest rally of the dry bulk market in more than three years have brought back joy among ship owners, especially those active in the Capesize m ...
|
|
|
Showing 4106 to 4110 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- PTC India Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- The University of Queensland
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
