We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 26 November 21
CHINA FINDS COMPLIANCE PROBLEMS IN COAL PRICE INDEX PROBE - REUTERS
China’s state planner on Wednesday said it had discovered some “noncompliant” behaviour among coal price index providers as it an ...
Thursday, 25 November 21
SE ASIA POWER DEMAND TO RISE AS STATE SUPPORT MITIGATES COVID-19 IMPACT - FITCH RATINGS
Electricity demand in south-east Asia is likely to increase in 2021, following slow growth or contraction in 2020, thanks to state support that has ...
Thursday, 25 November 21
FITCH RATINGS INCREASES MOST GLOBAL METALS AND MINING PRICE ASSUMPTIONS - FITCH RATINGS
Fitch Ratings has increased most metals and mining price assumptions, particularly those that benefit from increased longer-term demand due to glob ...
Thursday, 25 November 21
CHINA'S COAL PRICE DROPS IN MID-NOVEMBER AMID GOVERNMENT’S SWEEPING MEASURES - GLOBAL TIMES
China’s coal prices have dropped significantly in mid-November compared with the beginning of the month, with the price of coking coal and co ...
Wednesday, 24 November 21
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Inflation is the word that has dominated the meetings of foreign leaders and finance ministers in recent weeks, as rising energy costs, supply chai ...
|
|
|
Showing 401 to 405 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- White Energy Company Limited
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- PTC India Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Australian Coal Association
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- The University of Queensland
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
|
| |
| |
|
