We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 07 October 13
Q3'14 SUB-BIT FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP CLOSED 6.53% HIGHER THAN Q4'13
COALspot.com – Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swap (FOB ) for average Q4 2013 delivery gained 0.53 % on day and fell 2.33 percept month on month ...
Sunday, 06 October 13
DRY BULK FREIGHT MARKET STAYS STEADY IN SPITE CHINESE HOLIDAYS - SOLYM CARRIERS SINGAPORE
COALspot.com: The freight market continued to remain firm in spite of Chinese holidays.
The BDI closed at 2,084 points on Friday 4 October or up ...
Saturday, 05 October 13
CAPESIZE EARNINGS SKYROCKET AS A RESULT OF INCREASED CHINA DEMAND - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
An increased iron ore demand has triggered this latest dry bulk rally, which could get yet another boost during next week, when China is expected to ...
Friday, 04 October 13
NICKEL ORE SHIPMENTS - LESSONS LEARNED FROM LOSSES
One of the most pressing problems for the bulk shipping industry is the safe carriage of nickel ore. The increasing demand for this commodity is fue ...
Friday, 04 October 13
US COAL PRODUCTION UP 2.1% WEEK ON WEEK - EIA
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer produced approximately 19.70 million short tons (mmst) of coal in ...
|
|
|
Showing 4081 to 4085 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- The University of Queensland
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Planning Commission, India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- White Energy Company Limited
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
