We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 01 October 13
DRY BULK MARKET POISED FOR RETREAT ON CHINA HOLIDAY - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The start of a national weeklong in China as of Tuesday is expected to put a lid in the latest rally of the dry bulk freight market, as has always b ...
Monday, 30 September 13
NEWCASTLE'S COAL EXPORT VOLUME CONTINUES TO SLIP
COALspot.com: Power plant and semi-soft coking coal shipments from Australia's Newcastle port fell 8.38 per cent week on week to 2.67 million mt fo ...
Monday, 30 September 13
PANAMAX CHARTER RATES TOUCHING US$ 18K FOR A TRIP TO NOPAC - CAPT. REDDY
COALspot.com : The freight market continued to remain firm, BDI and the Panamax index up week ended 27 September 2013.
The cape index was fell to ...
Sunday, 29 September 13
API 8 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL Q3 2014 DELIVERY SWAP GAINED $1.19 M-O-M
COALspot.com : SGX has launched API 8 CFR South China Coal Swap on 29 April 2013 and SGX replaced the previous swap.
API 8 CFR South China Coal s ...
Sunday, 29 September 13
SUB-BIT INDONESIA COAL SWAP FELL ON MONTH AND WEEK
COALspot.com – Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swap (FOB ) for average Q4 2013 delivery fell 3.93 percept month on month on Friday 27 September 2 ...
|
|
|
Showing 4091 to 4095 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- White Energy Company Limited
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Australian Coal Association
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
|
| |
| |
|
