We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 12 October 13
PANAMAX: OWNERS ARE AT US$ 17-18.5K PER DAY; CHARTERERS ARE AT US$ 15.5-16K - CAPT. REDDY
COALspot.com - The futures market was heavily down on the cape size vessels and the physical average charterer rates on cape size vessels dropped by ...
Friday, 11 October 13
DRY BULK FREIGHT RATE POSITIVE MOMENTUM TO BE SUPPORTED BY HIGHER DEMAND SAYS BIMCO - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
BIMCO released its latest short term research on the shipping markets, estimating that the elevated level of Capesize TC average rates i ...
Friday, 11 October 13
US COAL PRODUCTION FALLS 7.70% IN SEPTEMBER
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer produced approximately 17.70 million short tons (mmst) of coal in ...
Thursday, 10 October 13
NPC AUSTRALIA SHIPPED 2.99 MILLION TONS OF COAL W-O-W
COALspot.com: Power plant and semi-soft coking coal shipments from Australia's Newcastle port up 12.04 per cent week on week to 2.99 million mt for ...
Thursday, 10 October 13
SEVERAL PANAMAX FIXTURES FOR 1 YEAR TC HAVE BEEN REPORTED AROUND $13.5K/DAY - FEARNRESEARCH
Handy
The market is not much fancy as several holidays in the Far East last week. Tonnage side seems tight in SE Asia but there are many of them in ...
|
|
|
Showing 4071 to 4075 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Planning Commission, India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
