We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 16 October 13
NEW STRATEGIES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN A RAPIDLY EVOLVING COAL INDUSTRY
The 12th Annual Coal Markets assumes even more significance as the industry seeks more market information, inputs on trade strategies, supply and de ...
Wednesday, 16 October 13
CAPES: RATES DROPPED; PANAMAX: ADVANCED - INTERMODAL
After a month and a half of straight weekly positive closings, the BDI has finished the week in the red. Monday started slow as holidays in the East ...
Wednesday, 16 October 13
WILL THIS LATEST DRY BULK MARKET UPTREND PROVE TO BE AS LONG-LIVED OR JUST ANOTHER MOMENTARY SPIKE? - CHRISTOS MANZTIOS
COALspot.com: So here we are again facing the same old question: Will this latest market uptrend prove to be as long-lived as all owners hope or jus ...
Wednesday, 16 October 13
KOSEP TO IMPORT 0.49 MILLION TONS OF 4600 NAR COAL FOR JAN - FEB '14
COALspot.com - Korea South-East Power Co., a Korean generator and distributor of electricity on behalf of five Korean Gencos intends to procure 490, ...
Tuesday, 15 October 13
CHINA COAL IMPORTS TO KEEP GROWING IN THE YEARS TO COME, ALBEIT AT A SLOWER RATE - EVA TZIMA / NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
In its latest monthly report, shipbroker Intermodal highlighted the growing role of coal in the energy mix. According to Intermodal's research anal ...
|
|
|
Showing 4061 to 4065 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Minerals Council of Australia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- White Energy Company Limited
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- The University of Queensland
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Planning Commission, India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Australian Coal Association
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- PTC India Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
|
| |
| |
|
