We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 22 October 13
KOWEPO INVITED BIDS FOR MULTI GRADE COAL
COALspot.com - Korea Western Power Co., Ltd. (KOWEPO), a Korean electricity generator intends to procure 240,000 tons of multi grade coal for its Ta ...
Monday, 21 October 13
SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP FOR 2014 DELIVERIES SHOW A POSITIVE TREND
COALspot.com : API 8 CFR South China Coal swaps for average Q4 2013 delivery fell 0.02 percept M-M on Friday 18 October 2013. The CFR South China Co ...
Sunday, 20 October 13
Q3'14 SUB-BIT INDO COAL SWAP CLOSED AT $ 61.80 PMT W/E 18 OCT' 13
COALspot.com – Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swap (FOB ) for average Q4 2013 delivery fell 0.93 percept month on month on Friday 18 October 201 ...
Saturday, 19 October 13
NICKEL ORE SHIPMENTS KEEP SUPRAMAX CHARTER RATES STEADY - CAPT. REDDY
COALspot.com : The futures freight market continued to go down which was reflected in the physical markets as well.
The BDI continued to be soft ...
Friday, 18 October 13
WOOD MACKENZIE FORECASTS CHINA WILL OUTWEIGH THE REST OF THE WORLD FOR BASE METALS DEMAND BY 2017
China set to account for 52% of 117mt base metals market by 2017
China is on track to exceed rest of the World demand by 2017, becoming the singl ...
|
|
|
Showing 4051 to 4055 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Australian Coal Association
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- The University of Queensland
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Planning Commission, India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
|
| |
| |
|
