We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 13 February 24
WHAT IS THE OUTLOOK FOR THE NATURAL GAS SPOT PRICE IN 2024 AND 2025? EIA
We expect the U.S. benchmark Henry Hub natural gas spot price to average higher in 2024 and 2025 than in 2023, but to remain lower than $3.00 per m ...
Monday, 12 February 24
US THERMAL COAL EXPORTS HIT 5-YEAR HIGHS AND TOP $5 BLN IN 2023 - REUTERS
United States exporters of thermal coal earned more than $5 billion in 2023 as they shipped out more than 32.5 million metric tons of the high-poll ...
Tuesday, 06 February 24
NEW E-FUELS PROJECT TO MAKE INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING CLIMATE-NEUTRAL - RINA
Transport and trade on the ocean blue must be made much greener. This is the goal of the new €17 million European GAMMA project, where compani ...
Tuesday, 06 February 24
INDIA SEES ANNUAL COAL OUTPUT UP 10.9% IN 2024/25 - REUTERS
India expects domestic coal output to increase by 10.9% to 1.13 billion metric tons in the fiscal year ending March 2025, a senior government offic ...
Tuesday, 06 February 24
INDIA'S COAL PRODUCTION INCREASES BY 10.3% TO 99.73 MILLION TONNE IN JANUARY - PTI
The country’s coal output rose 10.3 per cent to 99.73 Million Tonne (MT) in January, over the same month in the previous fiscal.
...
|
|
|
Showing 36 to 40 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Planning Commission, India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
|
| |
| |
|
