We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 23 February 24
STRONG OUTLOOK FOR THE TANKER MARKET IN 2024 AND BEYOND - DNV
Several factors have aligned over the past two years to create a robust and profitable market for tanker owners, which is expected to drive newbuil ...
Friday, 23 February 24
AUSTRALIAN COAL FLOWS TO ASIA HOVER ABOVE LAST YEAR’S VOLUME TONNES - SIGNAL GROUP
In the final days of February, the dry bulk freight market appeared to maintain a relatively stable momentum, particularly evident in the large ves ...
Friday, 23 February 24
RUSSIAN COAL SHIPMENTS FALL 14% AS SANCTIONS BITE - BIMCO
During the first seven weeks of 2024, Russian coal shipments have fallen 14% y/y. Volumes have gradually declined since October 2023 when logistica ...
Thursday, 22 February 24
BIMCO PUBLISHES SHIP FINANCING FORMS TO ENSURE UNINTERRUPTED USE OF SHIPS
BIMCO has published two standard Quiet Enjoyment Letters (QELs), the first standard form QELs available to the industry, to offer a tool that can e ...
Monday, 19 February 24
METALS INVESTMENT: THE DARKEST HOUR IS JUST BEFORE THE DAWN - WOOD MACKENZIE
Things often seem at their worst just before they get better. In terms of meeting our net zero 2050 scenario, we’ve reached a watershed momen ...
|
|
|
Showing 31 to 35 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Australian Coal Association
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- The University of Queensland
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- VISA Power Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
|
| |
| |
|
