We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 31 January 24
CHINA'S INNER MONGOLIA COAL OUTPUT HIT 1.21B TONS IN 2023 - XINHUA
North China’s Inner Mongolia autonomous region churned out 1.21 billion tons of coal in 2023 as it strives to guarantee the country’s e ...
Wednesday, 31 January 24
GAS EXPORTS COST U.S. CONSUMERS MORE THAN $100 BILLION OVER 16-MONTH PERIOD - IEEFA
Limited Demand Growth Could Dampen the Dry Bulk Market in the Coming Months BIMCOStarting in late 2021—before its invasion of Ukraine—R ...
Tuesday, 30 January 24
LIMITED DEMAND GROWTH COULD DAMPEN THE DRY BULK MARKET IN THE COMING MONTHS - BIMCO
Demand
In our base scenario, we expect cargo demand to grow by 0-1% in 2024 and 0.5-1.5% in 2025. This is a 0.5 percentage point reduction for ...
Friday, 26 January 24
RED SEA DIVERSIONS ADD NEARLY A MILLION DOLLARS PER VOYAGE TO SHIPPING COSTS WHILE DOUBLING TRANSIT TIME - LSEG
The incremental costs of diverting a tanker from Asia to NW Europe via the Cape of Good Hope is accounting for an extra $932,905 USD per voyage whi ...
Friday, 26 January 24
HARD COAL GUARDIAN ANGEL OF THE ENERGY SUPPLY - GERMANY COAL IMPORTERS ASSOCIATION
- No security of supply without hard coal
- The Substitute Power Plant Provision Act (EKBG) must be extended
- Higher grid fees due to the ...
|
|
|
Showing 46 to 50 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Planning Commission, India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Australian Coal Association
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- The University of Queensland
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
