We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 27 December 13
THE EXPORT OF UNPROCESSED MINERALS WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED AFTER 12 JAN 2014 - INDONESIAN ENERGY MINISTER
COALspot.com: The government of Indonesia will implement Law No. 4 of 2009 on Mineral and Coal in full and consistently by January 12, 2014, said, m ...
Friday, 27 December 13
INDONESIA SHIPPED 15.75 PERCENT MORE COAL IN NOVEMBER
COALspot.com: Indonesia, the world's 4th largest coal producer and the largest multi grade coal exporter shipped over $2* billion worth of co ...
Thursday, 26 December 13
COAL & OIL GROUP SECURES US$ 250 MILLION FUNDING FOR ITS 1200MW THERMAL POWER PLANT IN INDIA
COALspot.com: Dubai-based Coal & Oil (C&O) Group has announced that it has secured additional funding of approximately Dhs. 1 billion (appro ...
Wednesday, 25 December 13
DRY BULK INDEX LOST SOME GROUND THIS PAST WEEK - INTERMODAL
Chartering (Wet: Firm+ / Dry: Softer - )
The Dry Bulk Index lost some ground this past week, on the back of activity slowing down befor ...
Wednesday, 25 December 13
SHIPPING : AS FAR AS THIS CYCLE IS CONCERNED, 'WE HAVE SEEN THE WORST....!' - JOHN N. COTZIAS
In a week’s time the year comes to an end. Having been a speaker in two seminars over the past 5 days I was able to see the year ending trends ...
|
|
|
Showing 3936 to 3940 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- White Energy Company Limited
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- The University of Queensland
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Australian Coal Association
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- PTC India Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
