We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 13 March 14
HANDY: THE FAR EAST MARKET IS IN AN UPWARD TREND - FEARNRESEARCH
Handy
Atlantic is a bit under pressure for spot tonnage, but the underlying sentiment is positive for the short medium future. 2-3 legs are do ...
Thursday, 13 March 14
MARKET INSIGHT - CHRISTOPHER T. WHITTY
By Christopher T. Whitty
Marketing Manager
Cotzias Intermodal Shipping Inc.
During the last year we have noticed that a fair number of ...
Wednesday, 12 March 14
ADARO ENERGY IMPROVES EFFICIENCY AND GENERATED STRONG EBITDA IN 2013
COALspot.com: PT Adaro Energy Tbk, Indonesia's single largest coal miner posted revenue of US$ 3.28 billion and cost of revenue of US$ 2.54 ...
Wednesday, 12 March 14
DGOMC OF INDONESIA REVISED DOWN THE BENCHMARK PRICES FOR COAL BY 4.26% IN MARCH
COALspot.com - The Ministry of Energy & Mineral Resources of Indonesia has revised down the government's declared coal bench mark price ...
Wednesday, 12 March 14
DRY BULK VESSELS STILL THE CREAM OF THE CROP FOR SHIP OWNERS
Dry bulk carriers have remained the most popular vessel type among ship owners as proven by the sheer number of second hand vessel sales and new ...
|
|
|
Showing 3801 to 3805 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Planning Commission, India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Australian Coal Association
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Minerals Council of Australia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- The University of Queensland
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
|
| |
| |
|
