We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 20 March 14
CAPESIZE: WEST AUSTRALIA TO CHINA RATES HAVE CLIMBED BACK TOWARD USD 11 PMT - FEARNRESEARCH
Handy
From a slight improvement in the Atlantic to a more mixed picture this mid week. North Atlantic rounds showing softening signs whereas S ...
Wednesday, 19 March 14
INSTEAD OF DECIDING WHETHER THE GLASS IS HALF FULL OR HALF EMPTY, I AM CURRENTLY GLAD THERE IS WATER IN THE GLASS - EVA TZIMA
By Eva Tzima
Research Analyst
Intermodal Research & Valuations
Right when you think that you have all your facts straight, right wh ...
Wednesday, 19 March 14
EUROCOKE SUMMIT 2014
Press Release: ThyssenKrupp, Steel Institute VDEh, SSI and more headline Smithers Apex’s Eurocoke Summit
The leading coke, coal and s ...
Wednesday, 19 March 14
DRY BULK MARKET REBOUND LEADS TO MORE NEWBUILDING ORDERS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The steady rise of the dry bulk market, as evidenced by the return, yesterday, of the Baltic Dry Index above the 1,500-point mark (1,518), is fu ...
Tuesday, 18 March 14
SECOND QUARTER SUB-BIT FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP LOST 3.27% IN A MONTH
COALspot.com – Indonesia, the world’s largest exporter of the thermal coal's swaps for delivery April - June 2014 gained this pa ...
|
|
|
Showing 3791 to 3795 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- The University of Queensland
- Parliament of New Zealand
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- VISA Power Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
