We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 08 March 14
LETTERS OF INDEMNITY - SKULD
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In today's trading market, owners are frequently requested to accept a letter of indemnity (LOI) in exchange for complying ...
Friday, 07 March 14
DRY BULK MARKET TO BENEFIT FROM CHINA'S GDP GROWTH TARGET - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
With the dry bulk market freight rates finally making waves, China's aim of 7.5% GDP growth for 2014 mean once again positive news for the shipping ...
Friday, 07 March 14
RBCT, WORLD'S LARGEST COAL EXPORTING TERMINAL SHIPPED 1.78% LESS COAL MONTH ON MONTH
COALspot.com: South Africa's Richards Bay Coal Terminal (RBCT) the single largest export coal terminal in the world, shipped 4.487 million tons of ...
Friday, 07 March 14
INDONESIA SHIPPED 7% LESS COAL IN JANUARY 2014 COMPARED TO ITS DECEMBER EXPORTS
COALspot.com: Indonesia, the world 4th largest coal producer and the Global largest multi grade coal exporter shipped around $1.8* billion ...
Friday, 07 March 14
INDONESIA TO PRODUCE 421 MMT OF COAL IN 2014
Coalspot.com: Indonesia finally agreed to increased 2014 coal output by as much as 6 percent to 421 million metric tons from its previous plan, a se ...
|
|
|
Showing 3811 to 3815 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Australian Coal Association
- PTC India Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|