We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 23 March 14
THE COAL FREIGHT RATES SEEN SLIGHTLY FIRMING UP THIS WEEK - REDDY
COALspot.com: The freight market firmed up this week. BDI was up 8.26 pct week on week and index was closed at 1599 points. The Cape index was u ...
Saturday, 22 March 14
SHIP OWNERS INVEST $15 BILLION FOR NEWBUILDINGS AND SECONDHAND VESSELS DURING FEBRUARY - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
Ship owners have kept on their aggressive stance in the investment scene both for newbuildings, as well as for secondhand vessels globally durin ...
Friday, 21 March 14
DRY BULK MARKET STAYS ON RECOVERY MODE - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The dry bulk market has reached new year heighs, as a result of renewed Capesize demand. The Baltic Dry Index (BDI) ended yesterday's sessio ...
Friday, 21 March 14
US COAL PRODUCTION UP 1.5%; WEST MISSISSIPPI COAL PRODUCTION DOWN 1.85% WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com – United States the world's second largest coal producer, produced approximately 19.0 million short tons (mmst) of coal i ...
Friday, 21 March 14
MERCURIA ANNOUNCES ACQUISITION OF J.P. MORGAN PHYSICAL COMMODITIES BUSINESS
COALspot.com: Mercuria Energy Group announced that it has reached a definitive agreement with J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. to acquire its physica ...
|
|
|
Showing 3786 to 3790 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- The University of Queensland
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Planning Commission, India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- PTC India Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
