We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 30 March 14
FREIGHTS FROM INDONESIA TO INDIA IS EXPECTED TO BE SOFT NEXT WEEK - REDDY
COALspot.com: The freight market dropped drastically and all sectors were affected severely.
The BDI was down by 14.13 pct and closed at 1, ...
Friday, 28 March 14
US PRODUCED APPROXIMATELY 18.9 MMST IN A WEEK - EIA
COALspot.com – United States the world's second largest coal producer, produced approximately 18.9 million short tons (mmst) of coal i ...
Friday, 28 March 14
CHINA'S ENVIRONMENTAL MEASURES WILL NOT CURB GROWTH IN DOMESTIC STEEL PRODUCTION AND SEABORNE IRON ORE - WOOD MACKENZIE SAYS
Steel plants in China have been targeted as a major source of the toxic smog enveloping Beijing and Shanghai. Emergency measures have been impos ...
Thursday, 27 March 14
PANAMAX : SEEMS TO HEAD FURTHER DOWN; CAPESIZE : ANOTHER CHOPPY AND UNPREDICTABLE WEEK - FEARNLEYS AS
Handy
A weaker sentiment for the smaller size as well, with reduced activity in the Atlantic where Owners have to face significantly lower ret ...
Wednesday, 26 March 14
NEWBUILDING ORDERING ACTIVITY PICKS UP PACE ON IMPROVING DRY BULK MARKET CONDITIONS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The gradual improvement of the dry bulk market, as expected for some time now, is urging shipowners to increase their newbuilding ordering activ ...
|
|
|
Showing 3776 to 3780 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Australian Coal Association
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- MS Steel International - UAE
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
|
| |
| |
|
