We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 07 April 14
API 8 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAPS GAINED 2.09% M-O-M
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swaps for average Q2 14 deliveries gained 2.09 percent month on month and closed at US$ 75.68 per ...
Sunday, 06 April 14
THE FREIGHT MARKET KEEPS SLIDING
COALspot.com: The freight market continued to drop this week. The BDI (Baltic Dry Index) is a widely followed metric that reflects the overall r ...
Friday, 04 April 14
UNITED STATES COAL OUTPUT UP 5.4% IN PAST WEEK
COALspot.com – United States the world's second largest coal producer, produced approximately 19.9 million short tons (mmst) of coal i ...
Thursday, 03 April 14
PANAMAX SECTOR IS WATCHING A SEVERE DROP IN RATES - FEARNLEYS
Handy
A further weaker sentiment for the Supras as well in both hemispheres this week with oversupply of tonnage being the major headline. Tra ...
Wednesday, 02 April 14
CHINA: ARBITRATION CLAUSES IN BILLS OF LADING UNDER CHINESE LEGAL PRACTICE - SKULD
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Successful incorporation of a charterparty arbitration clause into the bills of lading is not a straight forward matte ...
|
|
|
Showing 3766 to 3770 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- The University of Queensland
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Planning Commission, India
- White Energy Company Limited
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
|
| |
| |
|
