We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 13 April 14
INDONESIA TO INDIA FREIGHT MARKET DECLINE CONTINUES
COALspot.com: The freight market continued to drop this week and BDI almost touched 1000 points. BDI closed at 1002 points fell 16.85 pct week o ...
Saturday, 12 April 14
HOW DO YOU CALCULATE LOSS OF EARNINGS FOLLOWING A COLLISION? - INCE & CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The recent case of Astipalaia vs Hanjin Shenzhen [2014] EWHC 120 (Admlty) has revisited the existing case law on asses ...
Friday, 11 April 14
US COAL PRODUCTION IN MARCH INCREASED 9.69% TO 82.6 MMST MONTH ON MONTH
COALspot.com – United States the world's second largest coal producer, produced approximately 19.10 million short tons (mmst) of coal ...
Thursday, 10 April 14
DRY BULK MARKET IS RISING CLAIMS BIMCO - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
Despite the recent fall of the Baltic Dry Index (BDI), when one compares the first quarter of 2014, to similar quarters of the recent past, it i ...
Wednesday, 09 April 14
DRY BULK MARKET STRUGGLED THROUGHOUT THE WEEK - INTERMODAL
The Dry Bulk market struggled throughout the week but the poor performance across the board didn't allow for any positive reversal, pushing ...
|
|
|
Showing 3756 to 3760 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Minerals Council of Australia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Planning Commission, India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- PTC India Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Australian Coal Association
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
