We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 15 April 14
NEWCASTLE SHIPPED MORE COAL WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com: In the week ended 07:00 hours 14 April 2014, power plant and semi-soft coking coal shipments from the port of Newcastle in Queensl ...
Monday, 14 April 14
SUB-BIT FOB INDO COAL SWAP FOR Q1' 15 DELIVERY CLOSED AT US$ 60.12 PER MT
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for average Q4’ 2014 gain on month and on week according to AsiaClear OTC coal swap's reports rele ...
Monday, 14 April 14
INDONESIA'S Q1 COAL PRODUCTION LITTLE CHANGED EVEN WITH PRICE DROP - INVESTOR DAILY
Indonesia’s coal production by volume in the first quarter remained little changed from the same period last year despite the decline in t ...
Monday, 14 April 14
API 8 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAPS GAIN FOR THE MONTH & WEEK
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swaps for average Q2 14 deliveries gained 4.61 percent month on month and closed at US$ 76.18 per mt as ...
Monday, 14 April 14
CHINA'S MEASURES TO STIMULATE ECONOMY'S GROWTH COULD OFFER ROOM FOR STABILITY IN SHIPPING MARKETS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
Since the outbreak of the 2008-crisis, the shipping industry, in most of its aspects, i.e. dry bulk and tanker markets alike, has been dealing w ...
|
|
|
Showing 3751 to 3755 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Economic Council, Georgia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- White Energy Company Limited
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- PTC India Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- The University of Queensland
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
