We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 22 April 14
INDONESIAN MARCH COAL EXPORT VOLUME SURGE 9.12% TO 35.54 MMT
COALspot.com: Indonesia, one of the world's largest coal producer and the global largest multi grade coal exporter shipped around $1.9 ...
Tuesday, 22 April 14
NEWCASTLE WEEKLY COAL EXPORTS FELL 13.33% THIS PAST WEEK
COALspot.com: In the week ended 07:00 hours 21 April 2014, power plant and semi-soft coking coal shipments from the port of Newcastle in Queensl ...
Monday, 21 April 14
Q1'15 SUB-BIT FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP SHOWING A POSITIVE TREND
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for average Q2’ 2014 gain on month and on week according to AsiaClear OTC coal swap's reports rele ...
Monday, 21 April 14
Q4 2014 AND Q1 2015 COAL SWAPS CLOSED MARGINALLY HIGHER COMPARED TO Q2 PRICES
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swaps for average Q2 14 deliveries gained 0.87 percent month on month and closed at US$ 76.15 per mt as ...
Monday, 21 April 14
DRY BULK MARKET UPS AND - MOST RECENTLY - DOWNS OFFERS NO ROOM FOR RELAXING AMONG DRY BULK SHIP OWNERS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The dry bulk market's latest demise, with the market retrating once again, since the end of March, has come at a time, when most ship owners ...
|
|
|
Showing 3741 to 3745 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- PTC India Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- The University of Queensland
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- White Energy Company Limited
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- MS Steel International - UAE
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|