We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 30 July 14
CAPES SEEMED TO BE STRANDED AT THE SAME LEVELS; PANAMAXES MANAGED TO SLIGHTLY REVIVE - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: The Dry Bulk market took a breath this past week, as both Panamaxes and Supras started to see a small influx of activity, which was j ...
Tuesday, 29 July 14
TOTAL SELLS ITS SOUTH AFRICAN COAL MINING ASSETS TO EXXARO
Total has signed an agreement with Exxaro Resources Ltd for the sale of its 100% stake in Total Coal South Africa (TCSA), its coal-producing affili ...
Tuesday, 29 July 14
GENCO: DRY BULK SHIPPING VALUATIONS NO LONGER ANCHORED TO DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW METHOD - WEIL
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Discounted cash flow analysis is a mainstay among the valuation methodologies used by restructuring professionals and bank ...
Tuesday, 29 July 14
SHIP OWNERS' DEMAND OF NEW VESSELS DENTED AS A RESULT OF LOWER FREIGHT RATES - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The sharp downward direction of dry bulk freight rates has had a negative impact on investors’ secondhand buying appetite that wait to see th ...
Monday, 28 July 14
Q3' 14, SUB-BIT FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP GAINED $ 0.08 DAY ON DAY AND $ 0.68 WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for average Q3’ 2014 increased by just US$ 0.08 day on day and US$ 0.68 week on week. The swap was lost U ...
|
|
|
Showing 3571 to 3575 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Australian Coal Association
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Parliament of New Zealand
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
|
| |
| |
|