We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 06 August 14
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - EVA TZIMA
Recent reports that Indonesia’s ban on exports of metal ore concentrates was lifted for the first time in six months for two of its biggest m ...
Wednesday, 06 August 14
SGX SUCCESSFULLY LAUNCHED NEW SGX COAL PRODUCTS
COALspot.com: Singapore Exchange (‘SGX’) has announced that, the exchange has successfully launched its new Coking and Thermal Coal pro ...
Monday, 04 August 14
ANNUAL SECOND HALF SURGE IN BRAZILIAN IRON ORE EXPORTS ABOUT TO BEGIN - JEFFREY LANDSBERG
COALspot.com: Great strength in the capesize market has all along been set to occur during the second half of this year, as that is when Brazilian ...
Monday, 04 August 14
SUB-BIT FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP INCHES UP DESPITE LOW DEMAND
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for average Q4’ 2014 increased US$ 0.15 day on day and US$ 0.13 per mt week on week. But, the swap was lo ...
Monday, 04 August 14
Q1' 15 API 8 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP CLOSED AT US$ 69.37 ON 1 AUGUST 2014; A $ 1.10 HIGHER COMPARED TO Q4' 2014 CLOSING
COALspot.com: Coal swap prices are showing a positive move upward this past week. API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q4, Q1 and Q2 2015 show ...
|
|
|
Showing 3561 to 3565 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Planning Commission, India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- White Energy Company Limited
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- PTC India Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
|
| |
| |
|
