We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 24 July 14
INDONESIA'S JUNE 2014 COAL EXPORT VOLUME DOWN 6.82%; AVERAGE SELLING PRICE DOWN
COALspot.com: Indonesia, one of the world's largest coal producer and the global leading multi grade coal exporter shipped around $1.70* ...
Thursday, 24 July 14
HANDY: SOUTH AFRICA SOFTENED A BIT, HERE RATES ARE AT AROUND 8K +150K BB FOR TRIPS EAST - FEARNLEYS AS
Handy
The handy market in the Atlantic is going sideways and a tick down on low activity. Levels hoovering around USD 5k on Supras. The SMX marke ...
Thursday, 24 July 14
INDONESIAN COAL EXPORTERS ARE REQUIRED TO OBTAIN ET-BATUBARA UNDER LATEST TRADE MINISTRY'S NEW REGULATION
COALspot.com: Indonesia's trade ministry has issued regulation No. 39/M-DAG/PER/7/2014 which is requires exporters of power plant coal as ...
Wednesday, 23 July 14
PANAMAXES WERE BACK ON A DOWNWARD COURSE; CAPES WERE FEELING THE MOST PRESSURE - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: The Dry Bulk market was on a downward spiral this week, with the BDI noting another week-on-week decline of the magnitude of 10% this ...
Wednesday, 23 July 14
WEEKLY SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
In Australia, the world’s largest mining group, BHP Billiton, will beat the iron ore export target of more than 220 million tonnes for 2014. ...
|
|
|
Showing 3581 to 3585 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Minerals Council of Australia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Australian Coal Association
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
|
| |
| |
|