We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 08 August 14
U.S PRODUCED 35.80 MMST OF COAL IN JULY; UP 7.89 MONTH OVER MONTH
COALspot.com – United States the world's second largest coal producer, produced approximately 19.50 million short tons (mmst) of coal in ...
Friday, 08 August 14
PORT OF NEWCASTLE SHIPPED 19.52% MORE COAL IN JULY FROM LAST MONTH
COALspot.com: The Port of Newcastle, Australia’s major trading ports and the world’s largest coal export port, has shipped 14,036,947 t ...
Thursday, 07 August 14
SHORT-TERM COAL OUTLOOK IMPROVES - SAM QUEST
With demand for and supply of coal to grow in the near future, prices are expected to rebound in the short term; the long-term prospects, however, ...
Thursday, 07 August 14
BULKING UP IN AFRICA: CHINA INFLATES SEABORNE MINERALS EXPORT TRADE - RICHARD SCOTT
Africa’s profile as an exporter of dry bulk commodities is rising. Responding to growing import demand from China, India and other buyers in ...
Wednesday, 06 August 14
CAPES: BUSINESS INTEREST REMAINS SOFT; CURRENTLY NO SIGNS OF IMPROVEMENT - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: Despite the considerable pressure witnessed in the freight market for most of the size segments, the Dry Bulk Index was able to note ...
|
|
|
Showing 3556 to 3560 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Parliament of New Zealand
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
|
| |
| |
|
