We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 24 August 14
SEA FREIGHT MARKETS STARTING TO LOOK POSITIVE; CAPES DRIVE FREIGHTS HIGHER
COALspot.com: The freight market has strengthen further this week with BDI up 7.19 pct week on week. The BDI was closed at 1,088 points while the B ...
Friday, 22 August 14
INDIAN IRON ORE ROYALTY RISE NOT LIKELY TO HURT STEELMAKERS' MARGINS - FITCH
Fitch Ratings does not expect an increase in India's iron ore royalty rates to have a major impact on the profitability of steel producers in t ...
Friday, 22 August 14
ARBITRATION CLAUSE IN LOU HELD TO REPLACE CHARTERPARTY ARBITRATION CLAUSE
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The Claimants had claims for cargo damage against the vessel Owners arising under four bills of lading. The vessel was th ...
Friday, 22 August 14
ICAP ENERGY LAUNCHES GLOBAL COKING COAL DERIVATIVES TRADING
First contract completed and cleared on CME
COALspot.com: ICAP Energy, the energy business of ICAP plc, announces today that it has successful ...
Friday, 22 August 14
U.S WEEKLY COAL PRODUCTION UP 2.4% WEEK OVER WEEK
COALspot.com – United States the world's second largest coal producer, produced approximately 19.60 million short tons (mmst) of coal in ...
|
|
|
Showing 3531 to 3535 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Australian Coal Association
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- PTC India Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Economic Council, Georgia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
|
| |
| |
|
