We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 18 August 14
CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP PERFORMED WELL THIS PAST WEEK
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for delivery in September 2014 increased US$ 0.45 (+0.66%) day on day and US$ 0.30 (+0.44%)&nbs ...
Saturday, 16 August 14
HIGH DEMAND OF IRON ORE SHIPMENTS PUSHED CAPE INDEX UPWARDS
COALspot.com: This week's freight market was buoyant with Cape and panamax index seeing a big jump pushing the BDI above 1,000 points week on c ...
Friday, 15 August 14
5TH ANNUAL POWER AND ELECTRICITY INDONESIA
5TH ANNUAL POWER AND ELECTRICITY INDONESIA
13-16 October 2014
Grand Hyatt Jakarta, Indonesia
Web Site
The country’s definitive ...
Thursday, 14 August 14
U.S. STEAM COAL IMPORTS REMAIN DOWN SHARPLY FROM HISTORIC HIGH IN 2007, SAYS EIA
COALspot.com: U.S. steam coal imports at power plants have fallen significantly from their peak level of more than 30 million tons in 2007 to less ...
Thursday, 14 August 14
INDIA'S PLAN TO START AN INFRASTRUCTURE BOOM AND TO INVEST US$ 1 TRILLION BY 2017 WILL SURELY AFFECT THE DRY BULK TRADE - FEARNLEYS
Handy
The Atlantic Supra market has continued its improving sentiment with rates climbing and TA´s are now up about US$ 900 w-o-w, said Fea ...
|
|
|
Showing 3541 to 3545 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Economic Council, Georgia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Planning Commission, India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Australian Coal Association
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- The University of Queensland
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- White Energy Company Limited
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
