We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 25 August 14
4TH ANNUAL FLOATING TERMINALS
4th Annual Floating Terminals
18-20 Nov 2014
Intercontinental Jakarta Midplaza,
Indonesia
Web Site
The Floating Terminal c ...
Monday, 25 August 14
THE BALTIC DRY IS JUMPING, BUT DON'T DRAW ANY BROAD CONCLUSIONS - NASDAQ
Those who consistently preach doom and gloom and see an economic apocalypse around every corner would make me laugh if it weren’t for the fac ...
Monday, 25 August 14
COAL CEOS: DEMISE OF COAL 'EXAGGERATED' - MARK WILCOX
By Mark Wilcox
Heads of some of the largest coal companies in Wyoming are saying the demise of coal has been exaggerated, though the industry def ...
Monday, 25 August 14
INDO COAL SWAPS W-O-W: NEGATIVE; M-O-M: POSITIVE
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for average September 2014 decreased US$ 0.15 (-0.28%) day on day and US$ 0.65 (-1.19%) per mt week on week. Th ...
Monday, 25 August 14
API 8 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP GAINED DAY OVER DAY AND MONTH OVER MONTH
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for delivery in September 2014 increased US$ 0.30 (+0.44%) day on day and decreased US$ 0.20 (- ...
|
|
|
Showing 3526 to 3530 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- The University of Queensland
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
|
| |
| |
|
