We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 30 August 14
RECOVERY IN SIGHT FOR THE DRY BULK SHIPPING MARKET - DREWRY SHIPPING CONSULTANTS
Despite weak freight rates so far this year, Dry Bulk shipping earnings are forecast to recover as demand for both major and minor bulk commodities ...
Friday, 29 August 14
U.S. WEEKLY COAL PRODUCTION DROPS 1.3 PERCENT, EIA SAYS
COALspot.com – United States the world's second largest coal producer, produced approximately 19.40 million short tons (mmst) of coal in ...
Friday, 29 August 14
ADARO'S PROFITS SINK FURTHER AMID FALL IN COAL PRICES - JP
Adaro Energy, one of the country’s largest coal miners, has reported a 31 percent drop in net profit in the first half of this year as global ...
Friday, 29 August 14
CHINESE LIGNITE IMPORTS: QUANTITY OVER QUALITY? - CLARKSONS
In the first half of 2014, Chinese seaborne coal imports declined 0.4% y-o-y to 148mt, largely reflecting a 3.3% fall in imports of steam coal. Mea ...
Thursday, 28 August 14
PANAMAX: OWNERS CAN GET AROUND USD 16000 FOR A FRONTHAUL; PERIOD MARKET - VERY QUIET - FEARNLEYS
Handy
The activity and sentiment is improving in the Atlantic with the general TA rate is up about US$ 800 w-o-w. We see more South American carg ...
|
|
|
Showing 3516 to 3520 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Australian Coal Association
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Minerals Council of Australia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- The University of Queensland
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
|
| |
| |
|
