We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 12 June 24
CHINA ACCOUNTS FOR 16.3% OF AUSTRALIA'S COAL EXPORTS, FOLLOWED BY INDIA 14.4% - BANCHERO COSTA
Global coal trade has really picked up pace in recent months, and is now fully back to pre-Covid levels says Banchero Costa in its latest report.
...
Wednesday, 12 June 24
LNG NEWBUILDING VALUES AT RECORD HIGH: 78 NEWBUILD ORDERS PLACED IN 2024, DOUBLING 2023 - VESON NAUTICAL
The number of LNG newbuilding orders have more than doubled from the same period last year where 34 orders were placed, compared to 78 in the first ...
Monday, 10 June 24
CHINA'S MAY COAL IMPORTS RISE 11% ON LOWER DOMESTIC OUTPUT - REUTERS
China’s imports of coal rose 11% in May from a year earlier, customs data and Reuters records showed on Friday, as lower domestic output this ...
Tuesday, 04 June 24
HOW DO WESTERN SANCTIONS ON RUSSIA IMPACT THE GLOBAL METALS, MINING AND COAL MARKETS - WOOD MACKENZIE
The geopolitical landscape for Russia, as a major supplier of various commodities, has undergone a dramatic transformation since the invasion of Uk ...
Friday, 22 March 24
CASE STUDY: DANGERS OF COAL CARGO - SKULD
Recently, a bulk cargo vessel carrying coal from South Africa to Singapore suffered a fatal accident, resulting in the deaths of three crew members ...
|
|
|
Showing 21 to 25 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
|
| |
| |
|
