We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 28 October 14
SGX'S FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAP FOR DELIVERY Q1' 2015 CLOSED AT $ 68.07 ON 24 OCT
COALspot.com: API 4 FOB Richards Bay coal swap for Q4’ 2014 delivery decreased US$ 0.65 (-0.96%) month over month and increased US$ 1.79 (+2. ...
Tuesday, 28 October 14
SUB-BIT FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP FOR Q1' 15 DELIVERY CLOSED 3.68% LOWER MONTH ON MONTH
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for delivery Q4' 2014 lost month on month and gained day on day and week on week.
The swap has lost US ...
Monday, 27 October 14
GOVT PROMISES TO EASE LICENSING PROCEDURES IN MINING SECTOR - THE JAKARTA POST
The Energy and Mineral Resources Ministry’s directorate general for mineral and coal plans to simplify the complicated licensing procedures i ...
Monday, 27 October 14
FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAP FOR Q1' 15 DELIVERY CLOSED $ 0.10 LESSER THAN Q4' 14 CLOSING OF $ 53.27 PMT
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q4’ 2014 delivery decreased US$ 1.43 (-2.61%) month over month and increased US$ 0.05 (+0.09% ...
Monday, 27 October 14
CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAPS PERFORMED POSITIVE THIS PAST WEEK
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q4’ 2014 delivery decreased US$ 1.68 (-2.55%) month over month and increased US$ 0.87 (+1.3 ...
|
|
|
Showing 3406 to 3410 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- White Energy Company Limited
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- The University of Queensland
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
|
| |
| |
|