We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 21 October 14
INDIA'S DIESEL DEREGULATION POSITIVE FOR OIL COMPANIES - FITCH
The Indian government's 18 October decision to deregulate diesel prices will have a positive effect on the national oil marketing companies tha ...
Tuesday, 21 October 14
LOW DEMAND PUTTING COAL SWAPS UNDER PRESSURE
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for delivery Q4' 2014 lost on day, week and month.
The swap has lost US$ 1.57 (-3.04%) month on month ...
Monday, 20 October 14
CHINA'S ENVIRONMENTAL POLICIES DO NOT SPELL THE END FOR COAL - WOOD MACKENZIE
China's environmental policies do not spell the end for coal Analysis across energy commodities show coal still accounting for 64% of power mix ...
Monday, 20 October 14
CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAPS FAILED TO PERFORM POSITIVE
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q4’ 2014 delivery decreased US$ 3.04 (-4.57%) month over month and US$ 1.75 (-2.68%) week o ...
Sunday, 19 October 14
LOW DEMAND PUSHES DOWN COAL FREIGHT RATES; VOLATILITY CONTINUES
COALspot.com: This week all the segments softened including BDI except for Panamax index.
The BDI was down by1.70 pct and clsoed at 944 points ...
|
|
|
Showing 3416 to 3420 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- VISA Power Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
|
| |
| |
|
