We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 31 October 14
BUKIT ASAM'S NET PROFIT ROSE 27.42% FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY - SEPTEMBER 2014
COALspot.com: Publicly listed coal miner Bukit Asam reported solid profits in the first nine months of 2014 year.
Coal miner Bukit Asam manage ...
Friday, 31 October 14
U.S PRODUCED AROUND 19.3 MMST OF COAL IN A WEEK
COALspot.com – United States the world's one of largest coal producers, produced approximately 19.3 million short tons (mmst) of coal in ...
Thursday, 30 October 14
COAL & GRAINS SUPPORT PANAMAX AND IRON ORE SUPPORTS CAPES
Handy
The Atlantic market has been flat this week. Rates are up about US$ 200 from last week on the TA´s, but the volumes are about the sam ...
Thursday, 30 October 14
DOES A LOU ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERLYING CARGO CLAIM COMPLETELY REPLACE THE BILL OF LADING ARBITRATION CLAUSE? - INCE &CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
In the context of cargo claims brought under four bills of lading, the Commercial Court has recently considered whether a ...
Wednesday, 29 October 14
GOOD REASON WHY Q4 CAPESIZE OUTLOOK WAS SO BULLISH AT START OF THE YEAR - COMMODORE RESEARCH
COALspot.com: There was good reason why so many analysts' capesize outlook for Q4 was so very strong at the start of this year. Brazilian ...
|
|
|
Showing 3401 to 3405 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- PTC India Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
