We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 07 November 14
U.S. PRODUCED 85.60 MILLION SHORT TONS OF COAL IN OCTOBER, UP 2.88% M-O-M
COALspot.com – United States the world's one of the largest coal producers, produced approximately 19.0 million short tons (mmst) of coal ...
Thursday, 06 November 14
THE ATLANTIC HAS REMAINED STRONG WITH A HEALTHY SUPPLY OF NEW CARGOES
Handy
This week has continued its slow trend in both hemispheres and even though rates are a bit up w-o-w it is not a clear sign for any improvem ...
Wednesday, 05 November 14
CAPESIZE SEGMENT ENJOYED FIRMING RATES ACROSS BOTH BASINS
Following a fantastic week in terms of rate performance for Capes, the Dry Bulk market managed to note another positive weekly closing, which stron ...
Wednesday, 05 November 14
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - PANOS TSILINGIRIS
COALspot.com: The steep appreciation in dry bulker values between late 2012 and March 2014 resulted in unrealistically expensive ship values compar ...
Tuesday, 04 November 14
INDONESIAN COAL SWAPS FOR 2015 DELIVERIES SHOW A WEAK TREND
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for delivery Q4' 2014 lost month on month and gained day on day and week on week, the trend was same as las ...
|
|
|
Showing 3391 to 3395 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Parliament of New Zealand
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
|
| |
| |
|
