We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 10 November 14
Q4' 15 FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP CLOSED LOWER THAN Q1' 15 CLOSING PRICE OF US$ 49.58 ON LAST FRIDAY
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for delivery Q1' 2015 lost month on month, week on week and day on day.
The Q1 swap has lost just US$ ...
Monday, 10 November 14
SGX'S API 4 FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAP FOR Q1' 2015 DELIVERY CLOSED AT US$ 65.44 ON 7 NOV, LOST 4.08% M-O-M
COALspot.com: API 4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for Q1’ 2015 delivery has decreased US$ 2.78 (-4.08%) month over month and US$ 1.41 (-2.11%) w ...
Monday, 10 November 14
MOZAMBIQUE SIGNED CONTRACT WITH ETA STAR OF UAE FOR OPEN CAST COAL MINE IN TETE - AIM
- ETA Star to build slurry pipeline over the 600 kilometers to Beira in Mozambique to transport coal.
- The viability studies show the presence o ...
Monday, 10 November 14
YEAR 2015 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP SHOWS A WEAK TREND THIS PAST WEEK
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q1’ 2015 delivery has decreased US$ 3.74 (-5.63%) month over month and US$ 2.19 (+3.37%) we ...
Sunday, 09 November 14
CAPE INDEX UP 3.06%; PANAMAX INDEX FELL 4.05%
COALspot.com: The BDI was almost at same levels compared to last week closing or just increased 0.77 pct from last week. The BDI was closed at 1437 ...
|
|
|
Showing 3386 to 3390 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Australian Coal Association
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- PTC India Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- The University of Queensland
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
