We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 07 January 15
2015 IS RIDDLED WITH CHALLENGES FOR THE SHIPPING SECTOR, MOST NOTABLY THE DRY BULK MARKET - HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
As the new year has now set foot for real, many are still looking to detect what’s in store for the various shipping markets, with the first ...
Tuesday, 06 January 15
SHIPPING MUST ADOPT CAN-DO ATTITUDE IN 2015 - MOORE STEPHENS
Shipping needs to adopt a can-do attitude in order to successfully meet the challenges which are likely to come its way in 2015.
Shipping part ...
Tuesday, 06 January 15
Q4' 15 FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP CLOSED 1.81% HIGHER COMPARED TO Q1' 15 CLOSING
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for delivery Q1' 2015 lost month on month and week over week.
The Q1 swap has lost US$ 0.74 (-1.51%) m ...
Tuesday, 06 January 15
FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAPS LOST W-O-W AND M-O-M, SGX DATA SHOWS
COALspot.com: API 4 FOB Richards Bay Coal for delivery Q1' 2015 lost month on month and week over week.
The Q1 swap has lost US$ 3.52 (-5. ...
Monday, 05 January 15
CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAPS GAINED WEEK OVER WEEK, SGX DATA SHOWS
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q1’ 2015 delivery has decreased by US$ 2.50 (-4.02%) month over month and gained US$ 0.20 ( ...
|
|
|
Showing 3271 to 3275 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Australian Coal Association
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- The University of Queensland
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|