We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 25 January 15
PANAMAX FREIGHT RATES STILL FALLING
COALspot.com: The BDI was slightly down this week to 720 points. The BDI lost 2.83 pct week on week.
The cape index continued its upward trend ...
Friday, 23 January 15
U.S. WEEKLY COAL PRODUCTION FOR WEEK ENDING JAN. 17 UP 2.5%
COALspot.com – United States the world's one of the largest coal producers, produced approximately 19.4 million short tons (mmst) of coal ...
Thursday, 22 January 15
PANAMAX: A SOFTER TONE AND OVERALL A SLUGGISH MARKET - FEARNLEYS
Handy
The handy and supra market has experienced yet another week with slow activity and softening rates in both hemispheres, broker Fearnleys AS ...
Thursday, 22 January 15
BUMI RESOURCES POSTS NET INCOME OF $13.3 MILLION 9M-2014
COALspot.com: Bumi Resources, Indonesia’s largest coal miner, reported today that, the company has recorded a net income of $13.3 million for ...
Wednesday, 21 January 15
PANAMAX MARKET MOVED SIDEWAYS OVERALL LAST WEEK - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: The positive sentiment in which the week prior ended carried on through-out last week as well, the end of which marked the first posi ...
|
|
|
Showing 3236 to 3240 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Australian Coal Association
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|